Friday, November 25, 2011

A Modern Day Lady Macbeth: Patricia Blagojevich

Rising Tension Phase:

  • established career as a real estate agent
  • married Rod Blagojevich, a political man involved in the state of Illinois
  • daughter Anne born soon after Rod was sworn in as Governor of Illinois
  • supported her husband and father in all that they did politically
  • reported to have assisted her husband in some of his deeds that caused his federal corruption charges
  • scrutinized by public, decided to join cast of reality TV Show, "I'm A Celebrity...Get Me Outta Here!"
  • continues to be scrutinized by public as husband's trial continues
  • stands solidly at husband's side as he is impeached and removed from office
  • husband's bail posted at $450,000.00-lower than what public had hoped for; Patti was forced to list both of their homes for sale as collateral
  • written up in article as the Lady Macbeth of American Politics

Climax:
  • husband found guilty of 17/20 charges (including fraud, federal corruption,and attempted extortion and conspiracy)

Denoument:
  • gave up real estate practice
  • sold both homes
  • paid husband's bail
  • tries to avoid politics 
  • is attempting to stay out of the public eye

Wednesday, November 2, 2011

Individual Assignment 7: Loyalty and Values (Nationalism)

What is the role of patriotism?
The dictionary defines patriotism as,"devoted love, support, and defense of one's country; national loyalty". The role of patriotism is that of loyalty to one's nation. 


What are the contending loyalties you experience on this topic?
What this question should ask is where the line is between loyalty to one's nation and loyalty to one's core values(family, religion, etc.) For example, let's say that an individual's family member commits a crime. Where do the allegiances of said person lie? It would depend on the situation. If the family member committed a crime such as murder, perhaps the individual would side with the nation. It would depend on the severity of the crime committed. A prime example of this contention is World War I and World War II. Canadian men and women were forced to fight. A pacifist would believe that fighting is not necessary to gain peace. The government would still force said pacifist to fight, and they would have to find their own balance between their loyalties. 


What are the benefits and drawbacks to Canadian loyalty?
One of the benefits to Canadian loyalty is that you always have Canada to fall back on. Being loyal to Canada means that you have those social programs and government-run initiatives that you need or want. One of the drawbacks is that in some cases, your national loyalty has to come first. You have to do what's best for your nation, even when its not what's best for you. 


A current global issue that demonstrates this is the situation with the European Economy. Greece is having to vote on a bailout package, that if chosen will eradicate its social programs. Education, among others, will be cut. Some religions highly value education, and if your national loyalty has to come first, you are going against your religious loyalty by deciding to vote for that bailout package. 


The truth is that the line between loyalties is a fine one, and it takes a lot of thought to make decisions that truly satisfy all parties involved. 

Saturday, October 29, 2011

Introducing Me: A Draft of My Introductory Speech

This Is Me
          My name is Naomi. I’m 16 years old, and the oldest of three kids. I have two brothers, Thomas and Harrison. They are 14 and 11. I live with my parents, who are still happily married, even after 18 years.  I’ve lived in Lacombe for 4 years.  

I don’t think that I’m interesting, but I have a lot that I am interested in. I love scrapbooking. That’s how I document my life, and all the things that happen to me and my family. I love to bake. Cookies, cakes, cupcakes, muffins, buns, pastries, breads, all of it. I love to read. I can’t stop. When I was younger, my teacher had to pick books out especially for me because I was so far ahead of everyone else. By the end of grade 1, I was reading at the level of a college graduate, so reading is also one of my strengths. I also love to write. I love it so much that I write essays for fun. I’m not lying. When I discovered blogging last year, and got the hang of it, I did it a lot. You could say that writing is one of my strengths, and on a good day, I might agree with you. Above all, I LOVE music. I play the piano, and I sing. I can relate to music more than anything in the whole world. It’s one thing that’s always there for me. When I feel completely alone and unwanted, I can listen to music, and feel okay again.

As for my strengths, I’ve already listed two. I can read and write quite well. I can think creatively when forced. I work well in groups. I’m super organized. My locker is in alphabetical order, and my binders are immaculate. I can’t be unorganized. It’s honestly impossible for me. Someone told me it was because I was undiagnosed OCD. I tend to agree with them.

I chose this class because it compliments my strengths, and I did really well in it last year. It was my best course, and I just really like it.

When asked about my future goals, I’m never sure if the person wants goals for my immediate future, or my 10 year plan, so I’ll share a little bit of both. I want to do well this year. This semester will be tough. Not only do I have this class, but I have all three sciences as well, but I’m going to work the hardest I can, and I’m going to succeed. If I stay positive, then I can do it. I want people to be aware of my goals for Students Union, and the position I hold. Those will be announced later, but for now, I’ll just say that I’m going to be incredibly dedicated to that. For university, I plan to go to the University of Lethbridge, and get a Bachelor of Arts degree in Anthropology. Anthropology, for those that don’t know, is the science that deals with the origins, physical and cultural development, biological characteristics, and social customs and beliefs of humankind.

I didn’t mention before that I love history. I think that there’s something for all of us to learn, somewhere in history. Maybe your life lesson can be found in the story of Joan of Arc, or the story of Anne Frank. Maybe Helen Keller or Martin Luther King Jr. can teach you something. If people would pay attention to history, but also understand it, the terrible things that happen in this world wouldn’t necessarily happen. Maybe there doesn’t have to be a World War III.

So there you have it. That’s me in a nutshell. 

Individual Assignment 5: Collective Consciousness


What was the basis for each nation’s identity?
How do they define nation and nationalism?
How are the different and/or similar?
Quebecois
-needed to be distinguished from the people of France
-political/linguistic distinction from the English population & from Francophones elsewhere in Canada
Nation: separate from one’s country---divided Canada, almost as if they didn’t accept the ideas behind a nation
Nationalism: Exclusivity---didn’t want to be a part of the Canadian nation----saw themselves as a separate nation, one which should get special rights
Differences: more separatist, not as united in ideals as other nations
Similarities: very proud of the Quebecois nation
First Nations
-needed to be separate from the “new” people of Canada
-many different nations
Nation: see themselves as slightly separate from the rest of Canada, because of different cultural, spiritual, political, etc. Practices
-individual nations have different beliefs
Nationalism: united people
-each nation has a different idea of nationalism
Differences: made up of many nations, rather than just one; mostly united in beliefs and values
Similarities: proud of nations; feel separate(like Quebecois)
Americans
-founded through immigration
-diverse backgrounds
Nation: a nation of culturally diverse, with similar values and beliefs
Nationalism: very patriotic, love their country
-united through their patriotism, which has many of the same values as nationalism
Differences: larger nation; united in “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness”
Similarities: pride(patriotism)




Editorial
How should Canadians identify themselves?

I was raised in the understanding that Canada is a diverse nation. We are all different, but we are all special in our own way. We may have different cultural backgrounds, but deep down, we all want the same things. We want to live our lives in peace, and be happy. Through experiences that I have had, I have learned to accept the differences of others, rather than berate or belittle them because of those differences. It is my opinion that we should identify ourselves with our differences, rather than our similarities. While our similarities might be important, our differences far outweigh those. We were born to be special. What would Canada, and the world, be like if we were all the same? Herein lies our answer. Identify yourself as a part of that diverse nation. Celebrate your differences, and love them.

Friday, September 30, 2011

Expressions of Nationalism

The flags represent my ethnicity and race, but the Canadian flag also represents my geography. I'm of English descent, and I was born and raised in Canada. My family's coat of arms is also part of my ethnicity. The quote represents my language. The recycling sign represents my relationship to the land, as I try to be ecofriendly. The Conservative logo represent politics. I am strongly Conservative. The Book of Mormon/Bible represents my religion and spirituality, as does the picture of angel Moroni. The image as a whole represents my culture, as culture is the sum total of the pieces of my life.

Wednesday, September 14, 2011

The Bronte Sisters: A Composition on the Life and Contributions of Emily and Charlotte Bronte

The Bronte Sisters
By MimiLou
                In 1816, and again in 1818, Reverend Patrick Bronte and his wife, Maria Branwell Bronte, welcomed two very unique, but also incredibly talented daughters. Charlotte wrote under the name of Currer Bell, while Emily wrote as Ellis Bell. In their era, women were not allowed to write, so these sisters created alternate identities, as it were, and wrote as men. At that time, men wrote romance novels. It was not a disputed issue.
                As authors, these women have contributed a lot to the literary world. Much like Jane Austen, their works are still read and revered. Charlotte Bronte wrote a lot about food. She learned from Shakespeare that it added imagery to her work. Poor, starving orphans ate porridge and potatoes. Rich, beautiful people ate griddle cakes and roast chicken, with French pastries for dessert. Food played an important role in her novels. If you did not know who she spoke of, you need only to examine what they are eating, and immediately you know their political standing or class.  (Roberts, 2003)
                A lot of what Emily and Charlotte wrote was at least partly autobiographical. Their mother died in 1821, and they were brought into the care of her elder sister, Aunt Elizabeth. She sent four of the five daughters to a boarding school, where they were treated poorly, and lived in incredibly terrible conditions. They endured it fairly well, hindered only by the death of two of the five sisters, Maria and Elizabeth, and eventually Charlotte went on to be a teacher, as well as a governess. Emily joined her in the profession later on. In 1842, Emily and Charlotte moved to Brussels, Belgium to attend the school of a friend, but also to perfect their French and German language skills. When Aunt Elizabeth died in October of that year, they returned home. Their plans to build a school in their area fell away, and they turned to their writing. Anne, their younger sister, revealed that she had also been writing, and they published a poetry compilation together, “Poems by Currer, Ellis and Acton Bell” .  (Dimnet, 1910)
                Emily’s best known written work and only novel, “Wuthering Heights” continues to amaze and please readers. It inspired Kate Bush’s first single, of the same name. The song is written from the point of view of Catherine, and it is her begging Heathcliff from outside his window, asking only to be allowed inside. It has numerous film and stage adaptations, as well as a musical. Charlotte’s novel, “Jane Eyre” is also very well known. It is one of the first pro-feminist novels, as the title character, Jane, is never portrayed as a damsel in distress. Through writing and publishing this novel, Charlotte let her views about Victorian-era women known. She believed that women and men should be equals, thus her themes of pro-feminism and equality. She was an architect of the feminist movement in literature in her time. Her books continue to be loved, and “Jane Eyre” has sparked quite a few adaptations as well.
                Keep in mind that “Jane Eyre” was published only a few years before Charlotte died. You could say that the very thing she wrote about, love, killed her. Nine months after marrying the love of her life, a pregnant Charlotte Bronte died. There is speculation that she died of dehydration and malnourishment, rather than the tuberculosis diagnosis that is on her official death certificate.  (Mapes, 2007) After her death, and that of her sisters, the popularity of their books exploded. To this day, they still grace the “Most Popular Sellers” shelves at book stores. They are loved by readers all over the world, and have been translated into various languages.
                It is argued that “Wuthering Heights” with its darker themes of mental and physical cruelty, as well as passion and love, is the better of the two novels. The reasoning behind “Wuthering Heights” being called the better novel is solid. It is darker, and it takes a great measure of control and deep thought to write literature of that kind. In comparison, “Jane Eyre” is a fantastic novel, but it is not as dark. Sure, it is thoughtful, but it just does not scare people the way Emily’s novel does.  Its themes are not quite as controversial, even though feminism was a new movement at that time. Basically, prominent literary minds can argue about which is the better novel, but the bottom line is that they are both truly amazing, with weaknesses and strengths. These women were not perfect, and neither are their novels.   
                Both of them contributed to the literary world in ways that they could not foresee. They did not know that their novels would have this amount of impact on literature, over 150 years later. They accomplished much in their short lives, and that is amazing. It is hoped that their books will continue to enrich minds and contribute to literature for many years to come.


Bibliography

Dimnet, E. (1910). Bronte Sisters. Kessinger Publishing.
Mapes, D. (2007, September 25). CNN Living. Retrieved September 12, 2011, from CNN International: http://articles.cnn.com/2007-09-25/living/mf.plot.twists_1_horatio-alger-charles-dickens-barnaby-rudge/3?_s=PM:LIVING
Roberts, M. (2003, May 5). Culture. Retrieved September 12, 2011, from New Statesmen: http://www.newstatesman.com/200305050048
The Bronte Parsonage Museum & Bronte Society. (n.d.). The Brontes. Retrieved September 12, 2011, from The Bronte Parsonage Museum & Bronte Society: http://www.bronte.info/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=12&Itemid=35

Sunday, September 11, 2011

2011-2012 Humanities 20 Logo

The words on the flags say:  Compassion, Respect, Freedom, Choices, Simplicity, Honesty, Integrity, Faith, Tolerance, Intelligence, Sense of Responsibility, and LOVE.